Witold Pruszkowski “Rusałki” (“Rusalkas”), 1877In Slavic mythology, rusalka (sometimes also called boginka) is a female demon inhabiting waters, forests and fields.Rusalki usually appear as beautiful, naked girls with loose hair* (rarely as old and ugly women). They are souls of girls who died before the marriage. Rusalki appear during the new moon (and also before the Kupala Night), entice young men and kill them by tickling or frenzied dance.In Rus’ (remember - Rus’ and Russia are not synonyms), at time of Green week, people used to celebrate Rusalki’s week.*In all Slavic countries girls used to plait their hair and cover it with wreaths - it was a sign of maidenhood. Married women and girls used to cover their hair with headscarves or something like wimples (many people who don’t know Slavic folklore think that only elderly Slavic women used to cover their hair, which isn’t true). Maybe Slavs described their female demons as beautiful girls with loose hair, because it made them even more “inappropriate”/”abnormal”/”evil”/”impure”?

Witold Pruszkowski “Rusałki” (“Rusalkas”), 1877

In Slavic mythology, rusalka (sometimes also called boginka) is a female demon inhabiting waters, forests and fields.
Rusalki usually appear as beautiful, naked girls with loose hair* (rarely as old and ugly women). They are souls of girls who died before the marriage. Rusalki appear during the new moon (and also before the Kupala Night), entice young men and kill them by tickling or frenzied dance.
In Rus’ (remember - Rus’ and Russia are not synonyms), at time of Green week, people used to celebrate Rusalki’s week.

*In all Slavic countries girls used to plait their hair and cover it with wreaths - it was a sign of maidenhood. Married women and girls used to cover their hair with headscarves or something like wimples (many people who don’t know Slavic folklore think that only elderly Slavic women used to cover their hair, which isn’t true). Maybe Slavs described their female demons as beautiful girls with loose hair, because it made them even more “inappropriate”/”abnormal”/”evil”/”impure”?

  1. athesmos reblogged this from zjavva
  2. oberiu reblogged this from zjavva
  3. souliko reblogged this from zjavva
  4. anioleq reblogged this from me-charlie-you-angels
  5. unpredictablystrange reblogged this from sociopathinhellwiththetardis
  6. sociopathinhellwiththetardis reblogged this from me-charlie-you-angels
  7. me-charlie-you-angels reblogged this from zjavva
  8. disteln reblogged this from zjavva
  9. yuumori reblogged this from tevaku
  10. tevaku reblogged this from shadowflay
  11. shadowflay reblogged this from zjavva
  12. princeofthestate reblogged this from zjavva
  13. magicoftheworld reblogged this from zjavva
  14. flyingcorpseinthesky reblogged this from zjavva
  15. cumullus reblogged this from polish-vintage
  16. phaesporian reblogged this from bheur
  17. happily-n-everafter reblogged this from matyldakwiatek
  18. matyldakwiatek reblogged this from ninneve
  19. autumnwerewolf reblogged this from bheur
  20. bheur reblogged this from swedishjazz
  21. martensitemaiden reblogged this from swedishjazz